Re-thinking Invasives

Cedar Waxwing in honeysuckle. Photo: Tomas Carlo

Throughout my Master Gardener  training, and later, in a more focused advanced course on weeds and invasives, the mantra of every instructor was “seek and destroy.” I don’t know how much money is spent by state and federal governments on programs aimed at eradicating species considered to be invasive, but I am sure it’s a lot. Is it effective? Not really, especially when some local nurseries continue to sell some of the plants we are trying so hard to get rid of.

Throughout all the training, in the back of my mind, there was always this nagging thought: we know that  invasive species crowd out the natives and that some, like oriental bittersweet and kudzu, are particularly noxious and destructive. These thugs were introduced to North America by humans, but so were sparrows and house finches and even honey bees. Isn’t  having to adapt to these new arrivals  part of a much bigger process called evolution?

One scientist is looking at invasives in an interesting way. Tomas Carlo, an assistant professor of biology at Penn State, has published a fascinating paper entitled: “Invasive Plants Can Create Positive Ecological Change.” Dr. Carlo and a graduate student looked at whether Lonicera, or honeysuckle, an established invasive fruiting tree, had affected the surrounding ecosystem in a positive or negative way.

Carlo explains: “We wondered: Are we sometimes doing more harm than good when we eradicate plants that, despite being introduced recently, have formed positive relationships with native animals?” “The fundamental goal is to return a natural area to its original, pristine state, with the native species occupying the dominant position in the community. But the problem is that most native communities already have been changed beyond recognition by humans, and many native species are now rare.”

Photo: Tomas Carlo

Focusing on an area of Pennsylvania, the researchers assessed the impact of honeysuckle not only on bird populations but other fruiting plants. They found that more honeysuckle resulted in  greater and more diverse  bird and native fruiting plant populations.

“The abundance of fruit-eating birds in the Happy Valley region is linked to the abundance of honeysuckle,” Carlo explained. “Honeysuckle comprises more than half of all the fruits available in the landscape, and it benefits birds by providing them with a source of food in the fall. Meanwhile, birds benefit honeysuckle by dispersing the plant’s seeds across a wider geographical area, helping the species to occupy more and more territory in areas already affected by human activities.” Carlo takes it one step further, warning that eliminating honeysuckle from the area would also remove an important food source for migrating birds – in other words, do much more harm than good.

To read more of this intriguing study, including honeysuckle’s unexpected benefits to native fruiting plants, go here.

Note: All quotes and photos in this blog have been used with written permission from Dr. Carlo.


About dirtynailz

Writer for a daily newspaper, gardener, tree hugger, orchid-grower, photographer, animal lover, hiker, wilderness seeker. Proponent of clover in the lawn and a dog on the bed.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Re-thinking Invasives

  1. cjwright says:

    You mention a honeysuckle tree. Is that different from the vine that I’ve always loved? I’ve never heard of a honeysuckle tree.


    • dirtynailz says:

      Hi cj and thanks for the “like!”
      Actually, the vining honeysuckle, (lonicera japonica), and the bush type described in the study( lonicera tartarica), are all considered invasive.
      Just keep a close eye on yours!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s